link to news story here: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-20547195 (sorry, don't know how to make it 'clickable').. i, for one, am glad to see that this has been clarified.
is it the same in the us?.
Thanks for making that 'clickable', Cofty.
I was aware of Reg Vardy but kept getting him confused with Reg Varney from 'On The Buses'! (another comedian, but not so dangerous).
My own view is that inculcation of children equates to a form of abuse.
I'd be interested to know how this sort of government declaration would be accepted in the US. o they have an equivalent?
i could just be reading too far into this but... even with plenty of opportunities and time to go, she didn't seem to make it out last month.
last night she said she was gonna go out today (the 1st) but... she's downstairs at the moment sipping coffee watching tv.
a few weeks ago on the long drive back from the assembly we talked about fs.
This is just a thought from a never was dub.
WT (and Mormons) could double their coverage if they really wanted to by sending out their people on their own (just as, here, door knockers selling telecoms packages, chugging for charities, etc., do).
I assume (being cynical) that the reason they go in pairs is just in case a dub on FS meets someone who could talk to them and challenge their beliefs. The 'partner' dub is there to prevent that. If my assumption is correct, that says someting about the dubs - about their knowledge and confidence in their faith.
the bible has expressions like: "--god walked in the garden at the breezy part of the day--" .
but more realisticly, speaking in today's lingo:.
if, as accepted by consensus, the universe was "smaller" in the past, expanding out of a zero size singularity, it was "smaller" than the "creator"* at that point in time.
" it was "smaller" than the "Creator"* at that point in time. point in every way."
There's a problem in that assumption, as in this one " If He existed before the physical universe, where did He live?".
If one believes in a supernatural creator then one must also believe that he/she/it didn't have to be of a certain size or 'live' anywhere.
In the world of the supernatural anything which is imagineable is possible (and everything that isn't). That's the whole point of the supernatural.
i thought that this was cute so i wanted to share.... .
a stalk of broccoli says "i look like a small tree"!.
a mushroom looks around and says "i look like an umbrella"!.
Well, this is appropriate for me as a grumpy old git in the madcap run-up to Xmas:
'I don't care who you are, fatty - get that sleigh off my roof'.
the bible has expressions like: "--god walked in the garden at the breezy part of the day--" .
but more realisticly, speaking in today's lingo:.
if, as accepted by consensus, the universe was "smaller" in the past, expanding out of a zero size singularity, it was "smaller" than the "creator"* at that point in time.
I understand that not only is the universe expanding but the rate at which it is expanding is increasing. Which means that at some point the rest of the universe will be too far away for us to see. Now that's a thought ...
link to news story here: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-20547195 (sorry, don't know how to make it 'clickable').. i, for one, am glad to see that this has been clarified.
is it the same in the us?.
Link to news story here: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-20547195 (sorry, don't know how to make it 'clickable').
I, for one, am glad to see that this has been clarified. Is it the same in the US?
glancing through the feb 2013 "public" watchtower edition, an interesting article appears on page 8.. here is the pdf download link.... http://www.jw.org/download/?fileformat=pdf&issue=20130201&output=html&pub=wp&langwritten=e&option=trgchlzrqvnyvrxf&txtcmslang=e.
it's interesting how, in the story, the young man's jw aunt and uncle switch him from mormonism to the jw faith using third-party material (the nov 8, 1995 awake!
article), and he ends up becoming a jw after confirming on the official mormon website that the claims in the awake!
Thanks!
glancing through the feb 2013 "public" watchtower edition, an interesting article appears on page 8.. here is the pdf download link.... http://www.jw.org/download/?fileformat=pdf&issue=20130201&output=html&pub=wp&langwritten=e&option=trgchlzrqvnyvrxf&txtcmslang=e.
it's interesting how, in the story, the young man's jw aunt and uncle switch him from mormonism to the jw faith using third-party material (the nov 8, 1995 awake!
article), and he ends up becoming a jw after confirming on the official mormon website that the claims in the awake!
This is an interesting article about the Mormons' 'Book of Abraham' and comments on their progress towards 'mainstream:
http://richarddawkins.net/foundation_articles/2012/10/23/mormonism-in-the-mainstream#.ULNF3u_6msM
(Sorry, don't know how to make the link 'clickable'.
i never was a jw.
i am an atheist.
(i keep introducing my posts that way, but it's for the avoidance of doubt).. on an entirely different mb, someone just raised the issue of fgm.
Thank you.
This is an issue which I don't think we should overlook, however 'politically incorrect' it may be.
I will be writing to my newly-elected 'Police and Crime Commissioner' but I don't expect any great response.
In the meantime, here I am. To those who promulgate FGM - I condemn you, and if you do it in the name of your god, I condemn him as well.
I am Chris Pope, of 27 Tudor Way, Haverfordwest, Pembs., Do your worst, I defy you.
i never was a jw.
i am an atheist.
(i keep introducing my posts that way, but it's for the avoidance of doubt).. on an entirely different mb, someone just raised the issue of fgm.
And, of course, it's so difficult (politically incorect) to question, let alone criticise, anything done in the name of religion.
Well, here I stand. I absolutely condemn this practice. I condemn Allah or whoever condones this. I say that you are child abusers in the worst way. Am I allowed here to publish my name and address? Happy to do so against this vile practice.
